Experimental evaluation of non-classical correlations between measurement outcomes and target observable in a quantum measurement
Masataka Iinuma, Yutaro Suzuki, Taiki Nii, Ryuji Kinoshita, and Holger, F. Hofmann

TL;DR
This paper experimentally investigates the role of non-classical correlations in quantum measurements by analyzing a sequence of photon polarization measurements, revealing significant deviations from classical expectations at the transition between weak and strong measurements.
Contribution
It provides an experimental analysis of non-classical correlations affecting measurement outcomes, highlighting their impact during the transition from weak to strong measurements.
Findings
Non-classical correlations influence measurement evaluations.
Deviations from classical eigenvalue ranges occur at measurement transition.
Quantum effects become prominent when varying measurement resolution.
Abstract
In general, it is difficult to evaluate measurement errors when the initial and final conditions of the measurement make it impossible to identify the correct value of the target observable. Ozawa proposed a solution based on the operator algebra of observables which has recently been used in experiments investigating the error-disturbance trade-off of quantum measurements. Importantly, this solution makes surprisingly detailed statements about the relations between measurement outcomes and the unknown target observable. In the present paper, we investigate this relation by performing a sequence of two measurements on the polarization of a photon, so that the first measurement commutes with the target observable and the second measurement is sensitive to a complementary observable. While the initial measurement can be evaluated using classical statistics, the second measurement…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
