Why Indexing Works
J. B. Heaton, N. G. Polson, J. H. Witte

TL;DR
This paper presents a simple stock selection model explaining why active managers often underperform benchmarks, emphasizing the difficulty of outperforming indices due to the distribution of stock performances.
Contribution
It introduces a model that explains underperformance of active management based on empirical observations of stock performance within indices.
Findings
Random stock selection can lead to underperformance
Active management faces significant challenges in outperforming indices
The likelihood of underperformance is higher than previously thought
Abstract
We develop a simple stock selection model to explain why active equity managers tend to underperform a benchmark index. We motivate our model with the empirical observation that the best performing stocks in a broad market index often perform much better than the other stocks in the index. Randomly selecting a subset of securities from the index may dramatically increase the chance of underperforming the index. The relative likelihood of underperformance by investors choosing active management likely is much more important than the loss to those same investors from the higher fees for active management relative to passive index investing. Thus, active management may be even more challenging than previously believed, and the stakes for finding the best active managers may be larger than previously assumed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies · Corporate Finance and Governance · Economic theories and models
