Disjoint $n$-amalgamation and pseudofinite countably categorical theories
Alex Kruckman

TL;DR
This paper explores conditions under which certain countably categorical theories are pseudofinite, focusing on disjoint n-amalgamation, and demonstrates that specific non-simple theories like $T^*_{feq}$ and $T_{CPZ}$ are pseudofinite, including for the first time their NSOP$_1$ status.
Contribution
It establishes that theories with disjoint n-amalgamation for all n are pseudofinite and extends methods to non-simple theories, providing new examples and properties.
Findings
Countably categorical theories with disjoint n-amalgamation are pseudofinite.
Certain non-simple theories like $T^*_{feq}$ and $T_{CPZ}$ are pseudofinite.
The theory $T_{CPZ}$ is shown to be NSOP$_1$ for the first time.
Abstract
Disjoint -amalgamation is a condition on a complete first-order theory specifying that certain locally consistent families of types are also globally consistent. In this paper, we show that if a countably categorical theory admits an expansion with disjoint -amalgamation for all , then is pseudofinite. All theories which admit an expansion with disjoint -amalgamation for all are simple, but the method can be extended, using filtrations of Fra\"iss\'e classes, to show that certain non-simple theories are pseudofinite. As case studies, we examine two generic theories of equivalence relations, and , and show that both are pseudofinite. The theories and are not simple, but they are NSOP. This is established here for for the first time.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
