Robust predictions for the large-scale cosmological power deficit from primordial quantum nonequilibrium
Samuel Colin, Antony Valentini

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a large-scale power deficit in the cosmological power spectrum, predicted by pilot-wave quantum theory, is a robust and general feature under various initial conditions and cosmological scenarios.
Contribution
It shows that the inverse-tangent form of the power deficit remains stable across different initial distributions and the inclusion of an inflationary phase, indicating a robust signature of quantum relaxation.
Findings
The power deficit (k) maintains an inverse-tangent form under various initial conditions.
The inclusion of an inflationary era does not alter the functional form of (k).
The dependence of parameters on pre-inflationary states is consistent with previous results.
Abstract
The de Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave formulation of quantum theory allows the existence of physical states that violate the Born probability rule. Recent work has shown that in pilot-wave field theory on expanding space relaxation to the Born rule is suppressed for long-wavelength field modes, resulting in a large-scale power deficit {\xi}(k) which for a radiation-dominated expansion is found to have an approximate inverse-tangent dependence on k (assuming that the width of the initial distribution is smaller than the width of the initial Born-rule distribution and that the initial quantum states are evenly-weighted superpositions of energy states). In this paper we show that the functional form of {\xi}(k) is robust under changes in the initial nonequilibrium distribution -- subject to the limitation of a subquantum width -- as well as under the addition of an inflationary era at the end of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
