Comparison of cosmological models using standard rulers and candles
Xiaolei Li, Shuo Cao, Xiaogang Zheng, Song Li, Marek Biesiada

TL;DR
This study compares five dark energy models using standard rulers and candles, incorporating a generalized mass density profile for strong lensing, and finds the cosmological constant remains the most supported model.
Contribution
It introduces a joint analysis of standard rulers and candles with a generalized lensing profile, relaxing previous assumptions and providing more restrictive cosmological constraints.
Findings
Best-fit gamma parameters are consistent across models.
Combination of data sets yields tighter parameter constraints.
Results favor the cosmological constant model over alternatives.
Abstract
In this paper, we used standard rulers and standard candles (separately and jointly) to explore five popular dark energy models under assumption of spatial flatness of the Universe. As standard rulers, we used a data set comprising 118 galactic-scale strong lensing systems (individual standard rulers if properly calibrated for the mass density profile) combined with BAO diagnostics (statistical standard ruler). Supernovae Ia served asstandard candles. Unlike in the most of previous statistical studies involving strong lensing systems, we relaxed the assumption of singular isothermal sphere (SIS) in favor of its generalization: the power-law mass density profile. Therefore, along with cosmological model parameters we fitted the power law index and its first derivative with respect to the redshift (thus allowing for mass density profile evolution). It turned out that the best fitted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
