Large deformations of a soft porous material

TL;DR

This paper reviews large-deformation poroelasticity, compares it with linear models, and analyzes errors in predictions for soft porous materials under mechanical and fluid-driven loading.

Contribution

It provides an overview of large-deformation poroelasticity, introduces an Eulerian framework, and compares nonlinear and linear models through specific uniaxial problems.

Findings

Large-deformation theory reduces to linear poroelasticity for small strains.

Linear models can significantly underestimate or overestimate fluid flow and deformation.

Deformation-dependent permeability impacts model accuracy.

Abstract

Compressing a porous material will decrease the volume of the pore space, driving fluid out. Similarly, injecting fluid into a porous material can expand the pore space, distorting the solid skeleton. This poromechanical coupling has applications ranging from tissue mechanics to hydrogeology. The classical theory of linear poroelasticity captures this coupling by combining Darcy's law with Terzaghi's effective stress and linear elasticity in a linearized kinematic framework. Linear poroelasticity is a good model for very small deformations, but it becomes increasingly inappropriate for moderate to large deformations, which are common in the context of phenomena such as swelling and damage, and for soft materials such as gels and tissues. The well-known theory of large-deformation poroelasticity combines Darcy's law with Terzaghi's effective stress and nonlinear elasticity in a rigorous kinematic framework. This theory has been used extensively in biomechanics to model large elastic deformations in soft tissues, and in geomechanics to model large elastoplastic deformations in soils. Here, we first provide an overview and discussion of this theory with an emphasis on the physics of poromechanical coupling. We present the large-deformation theory in an Eulerian framework to minimize the mathematical complexity, and we show how this nonlinear theory simplifies to linear poroelasticity under the assumption of small strain. We then compare the predictions of linear poroelasticity with those of large-deformation poroelasticity in the context of two uniaxial model problems: Fluid outflow driven by an applied mechanical load (the consolidation problem) and compression driven by a steady fluid throughflow. We use these problems to explore the steady and dynamical errors associated with the linear model in both situations, as well as the impact of introducing a deformation-dependent permeability.