A decidable weakening of Compass Logic based on cone-shaped cardinal directions
Angelo Montanari (University of Udine, Italy), Gabriele Puppis (LaBRI, - CNRS), Pietro Sala (University of Verona, Italy)

TL;DR
This paper introduces Cone Logic, a decidable modal logic based on cone-shaped directions in the plane, which is a weaker variant of Compass Logic and can express certain interval temporal relations.
Contribution
It presents a new spatial logic with a decidable satisfiability problem, extending the expressiveness to include key interval temporal relations.
Findings
Cone Logic's satisfiability is PSPACE-complete.
It can express Allen's interval relations 'Begins', 'During', and 'Later'.
Decidability contrasts with Compass Logic's undecidability.
Abstract
We introduce a modal logic, called Cone Logic, whose formulas describe properties of points in the plane and spatial relationships between them. Points are labelled by proposition letters and spatial relations are induced by the four cone-shaped cardinal directions. Cone Logic can be seen as a weakening of Venema's Compass Logic. We prove that, unlike Compass Logic and other projection-based spatial logics, its satisfiability problem is decidable (precisely, PSPACE-complete). We also show that it is expressive enough to capture meaningful interval temporal logics - in particular, the interval temporal logic of Allen's relations "Begins", "During", and "Later", and their transposes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
