Energy Dissipation and Landau Damping in Two- and Three-Dimensional Plasma Turbulence

TL;DR

This study compares energy dissipation mechanisms in 2D and 3D plasma turbulence using gyrokinetic simulations, revealing similar Landau damping features but slower dissipation in 2D.

Contribution

It provides a direct comparison between 2D and 3D plasma turbulence, highlighting the role of Landau damping and the differences in dissipation rates.

Findings

Both 2D and 3D simulations show electron velocity-space structures similar to Landau damping.

Landau damping likely contributes to energy transfer and plasma heating in both cases.

Dissipation is significantly slower in 2D turbulence compared to 3D.

Abstract

Plasma turbulence is ubiquitous in space and astrophysical plasmas, playing an important role in plasma energization, but the physical mechanisms leading to dissipation of the turbulent energy remain to be definitively identified. Kinetic simulations in two dimensions (2D) have been extensively used to study the dissipation process. How the limitation to 2D affects energy dissipation remains unclear. This work provides a model of comparison between two- and three-dimensional (3D) plasma turbulence using gyrokinetic simulations; it also explores the dynamics of distribution functions during the dissipation process. It is found that both 2D and 3D nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations of a low-beta plasma generate electron velocity-space structures with the same characteristics as that of linear Landau damping of Alfv\'en waves in a 3D linear simulation. The continual occurrence of the velocity-space structures throughout the turbulence simulations suggests that the action of Landau damping may be responsible for the turbulent energy transfer to electrons in both 2D and 3D, and makes possible the subsequent irreversible heating of the plasma through collisional smoothing of the velocity-space fluctuations. Although, in the 2D case where variation along the equilibrium magnetic field is absent, it may be expected that Landau damping is not possible, a common trigonometric factor appears in the 2D resonant denominator, leaving the resonance condition unchanged from the 3D case. The evolution of the 2D and 3D cases is qualitatively similar. However, quantitatively the nonlinear energy cascade and subsequent dissipation is significantly slower in the 2D case.