A framework for the measurement and prediction of an individual scientist's performance
Endel Poder

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new framework for measuring and predicting individual scientists' performance by analyzing publication and citation processes, exemplified through Estonian researchers.
Contribution
It proposes a novel indicator, the personal impact rate, that incorporates process regularities and practical measurement goals, advancing bibliometric evaluation methods.
Findings
The personal impact rate effectively captures individual scientific impact.
Application to Estonian researchers demonstrates the indicator's practical utility.
The framework aligns bibliometric measures with real-world evaluation needs.
Abstract
Quantitative bibliometric indicators are widely used to evaluate the performance of scientists. However, traditional indicators do not much rely on the analysis of the processes intended to measure and the practical goals of the measurement. In this study, I propose a simple framework to measure and predict an individual researcher's scientific performance that takes into account the main regularities of publication and citation processes and the requirements of practical tasks. Statistical properties of the new indicator - a scientist's personal impact rate - are illustrated by its application to a sample of Estonian researchers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
