A nonlinear population Monte Carlo scheme for the Bayesian estimation of parameters of $\alpha$-stable distributions
Eugenia Koblents, Joaquin Miguez, Marco A. Rodriguez, Alexandra M., Schmidt

TL;DR
This paper introduces a nonlinear population Monte Carlo method for Bayesian estimation of $oldsymbol{ extalpha}$-stable distribution parameters, outperforming existing techniques in accuracy and robustness, especially with limited data or challenging parameter ranges.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel NPMC algorithm for $oldsymbol{ extalpha}$-stable parameter estimation, demonstrating superior performance over traditional methods through simulations and real data applications.
Findings
NPMC outperforms existing methods in estimation accuracy.
Accurate estimates are achievable with few observations.
The method is effective across the entire range of $oldsymbol{ extalpha}$ values.
Abstract
The class of -stable distributions enjoys multiple practical applications in signal processing, finance, biology and other areas because it allows to describe interesting and complex data patterns, such as asymmetry or heavy tails, in contrast with the simpler and widely used Gaussian distribution. The density associated with a general -stable distribution cannot be obtained in closed form, which hinders the process of estimating its parameters. A nonlinear population Monte Carlo (NPMC) scheme is applied in order to approximate the posterior probability distribution of the parameters of an -stable random variable given a set of random realizations of the latter. The approximate posterior distribution is computed by way of an iterative algorithm and it consists of a collection of samples in the parameter space with associated nonlinearly-transformed importance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
