Difference Nevanlinna theories with vanishing and infinite periods
Yik-Man Chiang, Xudan Luo

TL;DR
This paper develops two new difference Nevanlinna theories for meromorphic functions with steps tending to zero or infinity, connecting discrete and continuous complex analysis and extending classical results like Picard's theorem.
Contribution
It introduces difference Nevanlinna theories for varying step sizes, including vanishing and infinite periods, and applies these to relate discrete equations to their continuous counterparts.
Findings
Recovered classical Picard theorem in the vanishing period case
Established growth restrictions for infinite period functions
Connected discrete difference equations with continuous analogues
Abstract
By extending the idea of a difference operator with a fixed step to varying-steps difference operators, we have established a difference Nevanlinna theory for meromorphic functions with the steps tending to zero (vanishing period) and a difference Nevanlinna theory for finite order meromorphic functions with the steps tending to infinity (infinite period) in this paper. We can recover the classical little Picard theorem from the vanishing period theory, but we require additional finite order growth restriction for meromorphic functions from the infinite period theory. Then we give some applications of our theories to exhibit connections between discrete equations and and their continuous analogues.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeromorphic and Entire Functions · Endometriosis Research and Treatment
