
TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between the Ratliff-Rush reduction number and the usual reduction number of an ideal in a Cohen-Macaulay local ring, providing an inequality that answers a previously posed question.
Contribution
It establishes that the Ratliff-Rush reduction number is less than or equal to the reduction number, addressing a question by Rossi and Swanson.
Findings
Proves $ ilde{r}_J(I) \\leq r_J(I)$ for m-primary ideals in Cohen-Macaulay rings.
Answers an open question by Rossi and Swanson.
Enhances understanding of reduction numbers in commutative algebra.
Abstract
Let be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring of positive dimension and infinite residue field. Let be an m-primary ideal and a minimal reduction of . In this paper, we show that . This answer to a question that made by M.E. Rossi and I. Swanson in [\ref{Rs}, Question 4.6].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
