Nanoanalytical TEM studies and micromagnetic modelling of Nd-Fe-B magnets
Gregor A. Zickler, Peter Toson, Ahmad Asali, Josef Fidler

TL;DR
This study combines nanoanalytical TEM analysis and micromagnetic modeling to understand how microstructural features like grain boundary phases affect magnetization reversal and coercivity in Nd-Fe-B magnets.
Contribution
It provides a detailed microstructural model based on TEM/EELS data and demonstrates how grain boundary properties influence coercivity through micromagnetic simulations.
Findings
Grain boundary phases mainly contain 50-70 at.% iron.
Soft ferromagnetic grain boundaries significantly reduce coercivity.
Shells of Dy or Tb increase coercivity by shielding nucleation sites.
Abstract
We have analysed the influence of the microstructural features, such as intergranular grain boundary (GB) phases and misalignment of the hard magnetic grains, on the optimization of magnetization reversal processes in order to improve the coercive field of Nd-Fe-B magnets. The microstructural model of the grains and intergranular phases, which is used for theoretical simulations, has been derived from a detailed nanoanalytical TEM/STEM study of a Dy/Tb free magnet and a high coercive (Nd,Tb)-Fe-B magnet. Special attention is laid on the EELS analysis of GB with a thickness ranging from 2 - 30 nm. This analysis identified the majority of the GB phases to have about 50 -70 at.% of iron and only a few GBs, which are connecting two nearby grain boundary junctions (GBj), possess a similar chemical composition as the adjacent GBj with a low iron content (< 10 at. %) and a high rare earth and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
