A model-independent confirmation of the $Z(4430)^-$ state
LHCb collaboration: R. Aaij, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi, A. Affolder, Z., Ajaltouni, S. Akar, J. Albrecht, F. Alessio, M. Alexander, S. Ali, G., Alkhazov, P. Alvarez Cartelle, A.A. Alves Jr, S. Amato, S. Amerio, Y. Amhis,, L. An, L. Anderlini, J. Anderson, G. Andreassi, M. Andreotti

TL;DR
This paper provides a model-independent confirmation of the $Z(4430)^-$ state by analyzing $B^0$ decays, showing that the observed spectrum cannot be explained solely by known $K o ext{reflection}$ effects.
Contribution
It introduces a model-independent method to confirm the $Z(4430)^-$ state, avoiding assumptions about resonance shapes or interference.
Findings
The $ ext{psi}(2S) o ext{pi}$ mass spectrum cannot be explained by $K o ext{reflection}$ alone.
The data reject the $K o ext{reflection}$ hypothesis with more than 8$\sigma$ significance.
Confirmation of the $Z(4430)^-$ as an exotic resonance.
Abstract
The decay is analyzed using of collision data collected with the LHCb detector. A model-independent description of the mass spectrum is obtained, using as input the mass spectrum and angular distribution derived directly from data, without requiring a theoretical description of resonance shapes or their interference. The hypothesis that the mass spectrum can be described in terms of reflections alone is rejected with more than 8 significance. This provides confirmation, in a model-independent way, of the need for an additional resonant component in the mass region of the exotic state.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
