Characterization of a Low-Frequency Radio Astronomy Prototype Array in Western Australia
A. T. Sutinjo, T. M. Colegate, R. B. Wayth, P. J. Hall, E. de Lera, Acedo, T. Booler, A. J. Faulkner, L. Feng, N. Hurley-Walker, B. Juswardy, S., K. Padhi, N. Razavi-Ghods, M. Sokolowski, S. J. Tingay, J. G. Bij de Vaate

TL;DR
This paper presents the characterization of a prototype low-frequency radio array, AAVS0.5, using both astronomical interferometry and detailed simulations, to inform the design of next-generation radio telescopes like the SKA.
Contribution
It introduces a novel dual-method approach combining in-situ interferometry and full-wave simulation for array characterization, enhancing design accuracy for future radio telescopes.
Findings
Array sensitivity measurements match simulations within expected uncertainties.
Beam pattern characterization reveals areas for design improvement.
Dual-method approach proves effective for array validation.
Abstract
We report characterization results for an engineering prototype of a next-generation low-frequency radio astronomy array. This prototype, which we refer to as the Aperture Array Verification System 0.5 (AAVS0.5), is a sparse pseudo-random array of 16 log-periodic antennas designed for 70-450 MHz. It is co-located with the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) at the Murchison Radioastronomy Observatory (MRO) near the Australian Square Kilometre Array (SKA) core site. We characterize the AAVS0.5 using two methods: in-situ radio interferometry with astronomical sources and an engineering approach based on detailed full-wave simulation. In-situ measurement of the small prototype array is challenging due to the dominance of the Galactic noise and the relatively weaker calibration sources easily accessible in the southern sky. The MWA, with its 128 "tiles" and up to 3 km baselines, enabled in-situ…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
