Multiplicity and transverse momentum fluctuations in inelastic proton-proton interactions at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron
NA61/SHINE Collaboration: A. Aduszkiewicz, Y. Ali, E. Andronov, T., Anticic, N. Antoniou, B. Baatar, F. Bay, A. Blondel, J. Blumer, M. Bogomilov,, A. Bravar, J. Brzychczyk, S. A. Bunyatov, O. Busygina, P. Christakoglou, M., Cirkovic, T. Czopowicz, N. Davis, S. Debieux

TL;DR
This study measures multiplicity and transverse momentum fluctuations in inelastic proton-proton interactions at various energies, revealing significant deviations from independent particle production models and highlighting the limitations of current Monte Carlo models.
Contribution
First comprehensive correction of fluctuation measurements for experimental biases in inelastic p+p interactions across multiple energies.
Findings
Fluctuations deviate from independent particle production expectations.
Monte Carlo models EPOS and UrQMD do not match the data.
Multiplicity fluctuations are higher than in central Pb+Pb collisions.
Abstract
Measurements of multiplicity and transverse momentum fluctuations of charged particles were performed in inelastic p+p interactions at 20, 31, 40, 80 and 158 GeV/c beam momentum. Results for the scaled variance of the multiplicity distribution and for three strongly intensive measures of multiplicity and transverse momentum fluctuations $\Delta[P_{T},N]$, $\Sigma[P_{T},N]$ and $\Phi_{p_T}$ are presented. For the first time the results on fluctuations are fully corrected for experimental biases. The results on multiplicity and transverse momentum fluctuations significantly deviate from expectations for the independent particle production. They also depend on charges of selected hadrons. The string-resonance Monte Carlo models EPOS and UrQMD do not describe the data. The scaled variance of multiplicity fluctuations is significantly higher in inelastic p+p interactions than in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
