Clamping Improves TRW and Mean Field Approximations
Adrian Weller, Justin Domke

TL;DR
This paper investigates how clamping variables can improve approximate inference methods like TRW and mean field in graphical models, providing theoretical guarantees and practical methods for better bounds.
Contribution
It introduces new methods for selecting variables to clamp, especially in binary models, and demonstrates how to improve approximation bounds in graphical models.
Findings
Clamping improves TRW and mean field bounds in practice.
Identifies highly frustrated cycles as key to effective clamping.
Provides empirical guidelines for practitioners.
Abstract
We examine the effect of clamping variables for approximate inference in undirected graphical models with pairwise relationships and discrete variables. For any number of variable labels, we demonstrate that clamping and summing approximate sub-partition functions can lead only to a decrease in the partition function estimate for TRW, and an increase for the naive mean field method, in each case guaranteeing an improvement in the approximation and bound. We next focus on binary variables, add the Bethe approximation to consideration and examine ways to choose good variables to clamp, introducing new methods. We show the importance of identifying highly frustrated cycles, and of checking the singleton entropy of a variable. We explore the value of our methods by empirical analysis and draw lessons to guide practitioners.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Machine Learning and Data Classification · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
