TL;DR
This paper introduces a model-independent method using principal component analysis to compare simulation outputs, ensuring distributional equivalence of different model implementations without relying on specific output features.
Contribution
It presents a novel, automated technique for comparing stochastic model implementations that is distribution-agnostic and simplifies the validation process.
Findings
Method produces results similar to manual feature selection.
Technique is automatic and distribution-independent.
Applicable to verifying model replication accuracy.
Abstract
Computational models of complex systems are usually elaborate and sensitive to implementation details, characteristics which often affect their verification and validation. Model replication is a possible solution to this issue. It avoids biases associated with the language or toolkit used to develop the original model, not only promoting its verification and validation, but also fostering the credibility of the underlying conceptual model. However, different model implementations must be compared to assess their equivalence. The problem is, given two or more implementations of a stochastic model, how to prove that they display similar behavior? In this paper, we present a model comparison technique, which uses principal component analysis to convert simulation output into a set of linearly uncorrelated statistical measures, analyzable in a consistent, model-independent fashion. It is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
