$AdS_2$ holography is (non-)trivial for (non-)constant dilaton
Daniel Grumiller, Jakob Salzer, and Dmitri Vassilevich

TL;DR
This paper investigates the triviality of $AdS_2$ holography in two-dimensional dilaton gravity with Maxwell fields, showing it is trivial under constant dilaton boundary conditions but non-trivial for certain linear dilaton boundary conditions, with consistent entropy calculations.
Contribution
It demonstrates the triviality of $AdS_2$ holography with constant dilaton boundary conditions and identifies conditions under which the holography becomes non-trivial, including specific boundary conditions in the charged Jackiw--Teitelboim model.
Findings
Boundary charges are trivial for constant dilaton boundary conditions.
The quantum gravity partition function equals unity under these conditions.
The charged Jackiw--Teitelboim model is non-trivial for certain linear dilaton boundary conditions.
Abstract
We study generic two-dimensional dilaton gravity with a Maxwell field and prove its triviality for constant dilaton boundary conditions, despite of the appearance of a Virasoro algebra with non-zero central charge. We do this by calculating the canonical boundary charges, which turn out to be trivial, and by calculating the quantum gravity partition function, which turns out to be unity. We show that none of the following modifications changes our conclusions: looser boundary conditions, non-linear interactions of the Maxwell field with the dilaton, inclusion of higher spin fields, inclusion of generic gauge fields. Finally, we consider specifically the charged Jackiw--Teitelboim model, whose holographic study was pioneered by Hartman and Strominger, and show that it is non-trivial for certain linear dilaton boundary conditions. We calculate the entropy from the Euclidean path integral,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
