Note on Onsager's conjecture
Peter Stubbe

TL;DR
This paper critically examines Onsager's conjecture, discussing the conditions under which solutions to the Euler equations conserve energy and highlighting shortcomings in the original ideas of energy dissipation without viscosity.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of Onsager's conjecture, clarifying misconceptions and unveiling shortcomings in the concept of anomalous energy dissipation.
Findings
Identifies limitations in Onsager's original conjecture
Highlights issues with the concept of anomalous dissipation
Clarifies the relationship between solution roughness and energy conservation
Abstract
Onsager conjectured that solutions of the incompressible Euler equations possessing a certain degree of roughness do not conserve the kinetic energy. Since, within the physical frame of Onsager's conjecture, the kinetic energy is the only occurring energy, and thus identical with the total energy, the implication would be that the conservation of energy is not absolute, but subject to the properties of mathematical solutions. Further, Onsager introduced the concept of anomalous dissipation of kinetic energy without viscosity. Both these aspects are critically discussed and their shortcomings unveiled.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory · Navier-Stokes equation solutions · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
