Performance v. Turnover: A Story by 4,000 Alphas
Zura Kakushadze, Igor Tulchinsky

TL;DR
This study analyzes data from 4,000 real-life trading portfolios to understand how returns and costs scale with turnover and volatility, revealing that returns are largely independent of turnover and follow a specific volatility scaling.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale empirical analysis of real-life trading portfolios, revealing key scaling laws between returns, turnover, and volatility.
Findings
Cents-per-share scales inversely with turnover (C ~ 1/T)
Portfolio return shows no significant dependence on turnover
Return scales with volatility as R ~ V^0.8-0.85
Abstract
We analyze empirical data for 4,000 real-life trading portfolios (U.S. equities) with holding periods of about 0.7-19 trading days. We find a simple scaling C ~ 1/T, where C is cents-per-share, and T is the portfolio turnover. Thus, the portfolio return R has no statistically significant dependence on the turnover T. We also find a scaling R ~ V^X, where V is the portfolio volatility, and the power X is around 0.8-0.85 for holding periods up to 10 days or so. To our knowledge, this is the only publicly available empirical study on such a large number of real-life trading portfolios/alphas.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies · Stock Market Forecasting Methods · Corporate Finance and Governance
