A Constrained-Gradient Method to Control Divergence Errors in Numerical MHD

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new constrained-gradient scheme for numerical MHD that significantly reduces divergence errors, improving accuracy and stability across various methods, especially at discontinuities.

Contribution

The proposed hybrid projection constrained-gradient scheme minimizes divergence errors in numerical MHD, applicable to any reconstruction-based method, and outperforms existing cleaning schemes.

Findings

Reduces maximum div-B errors by 1-3 orders of magnitude.

Eliminates systematic errors at discontinuities.

Achieves accuracy comparable to constrained transport methods.

Abstract

In numerical magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), a major challenge is maintaining zero magnetic field-divergence (div-B). Constrained transport (CT) schemes can achieve this at high accuracy, but have generally been restricted to very specific methods. For more general (meshless, moving-mesh, or ALE) methods, 'divergence-cleaning' schemes reduce the div-B errors, however they can still be significant, especially at discontinuities, and can lead to systematic deviations from correct solutions which converge away very slowly. Here we propose a new constrained gradient (CG) scheme which augments these with a hybrid projection step, and can be applied to any numerical scheme with a reconstruction. This iteratively approximates the least-squares minimizing, globally divergence-free reconstruction of the fluid. We emphasize that, unlike 'locally divergence free' methods, this actually minimizes the numerically unstable div-B terms, without affecting the convergence order of the method. We implement this in the mesh-free code GIZMO and compare a wide range of test problems. Compared to state-of-the-art cleaning schemes, our CG method reduces the maximum div-B errors in each problem by 1-3 orders of magnitude (2-5 dex below the typical errors if no div-B cleaning is used). By preventing large div-B even at unresolved discontinuities, the method eliminates systematic errors at jumps. In every problem, the accuracy of our CG results is comparable to CT methods. The cost is modest, ~30% of the hydro algorithm, and the CG correction can be easily implemented in a wide range of different numerical MHD methods. While for many problems, we find Dedner-type cleaning schemes are sufficient for good results, we identify a wide range of problems where using only the simplest Powell or '8-wave' cleaning can produce systematic, order-of-magnitude errors.