An Adaptable Dual Species Effusive Source and Zeeman Slower Design Demonstrated with Rb and Li
William Bowden, Will Gunton, Mariusz Semczuk, Kahan Dare, Kirk W., Madison

TL;DR
This paper introduces a versatile dual-species effusive source and Zeeman slower design capable of producing slow atomic beams for elements with large mass differences, demonstrated with Rb and Li, achieving high MOT loading rates.
Contribution
The authors present a novel, adaptable dual-species Zeeman slower design with segmented coils and thermal separation, enabling efficient slowing of different atomic species with minimal system size.
Findings
Achieved MOT loading rates of 8×10^8 atoms/s for Rb and 1.5×10^8 atoms/s for Li.
Demonstrated the system's ability to operate continuously for 4-10 years based on reservoir lifetimes.
Validated the design's effectiveness with performance comparable to existing dual-species Zeeman slowers.
Abstract
We present a dual-species effusive source and Zeeman slower designed to produce slow atomic beams of two elements with a large mass difference and with very different oven temperature requirements. We demonstrate this design for the case of Li and Rb and achieve MOT loading rates equivalent to that reported in prior work on dual species (Rb+Li) Zeeman slowers operating at the same oven temperatures. Key design choices, including thermally separating the effusive sources and using a segmented coil design to enable computer control of the magnetic field profile, ensure that the apparatus can be easily modified to slow other atomic species. By performing the final slowing using the quadruple magnetic field of the MOT, we are able to shorten our Zeeman slower length making for a more compact system without compromising performance. We outline the construction and analyze the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
