Reply to Comments on "Stored energies and radiation Q"
Wen Geyi

TL;DR
This paper refutes a comment on their previous work, demonstrating that the comment is based on fundamental errors and misconceptions about antenna theory, leading to incorrect conclusions and misinterpretations.
Contribution
The authors clarify and defend their original findings by identifying and correcting the misconceptions and errors in the comment, reaffirming the validity of their results.
Findings
The comment contains multiple errors and misconceptions.
The false assumption about terminal current leads to incorrect equations.
The numerical results in the comment are based on misused models.
Abstract
It will be shown that the comment [1] contains numerous errors, misconceptions, inaccuracies, false assumptions, misunderstandings and unjustified claims. The analysis of the comment is built on a false assumption that the terminal current of an antenna fed by a waveguide is independent of frequency. This false assumption arises from the misunderstandings on the basic theory of transmission lines and misconceptions of normalization for a linear system. As a result, all the equations obtained from the assumption in the comment are incorrect, and the related discussions are untruthful. The delta gap source modeling has been abused in the comment, and this is reflected in the numerical results in the comment that give rise to negative stored energy. The main results of the commented paper have been misinterpreted by the authors of the comment, and the related analysis is established on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
