How to avoid unnatural hierarchical thermal leptogenesis
Jackson D. Clarke

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that minimal three-flavour hierarchical thermal leptogenesis cannot naturally explain neutrino masses and baryon asymmetry, and explores potential resolutions involving a second Higgs doublet.
Contribution
It proves the impossibility of avoiding unnatural hierarchical thermal leptogenesis in minimal three-flavour Type I seesaw models and discusses a solution with a second Higgs doublet.
Findings
Hierarchical thermal leptogenesis cannot be naturally realized in minimal three-flavour models.
A second Higgs doublet can enable low- to intermediate-scale leptogenesis.
Models predict a SM-like Higgs and TeV-scale scalar states.
Abstract
A one-flavour naturalness argument suggests that the Type I seesaw model cannot naturally explain neutrino masses and the baryon asymmetry of the Universe via hierarchical thermal leptogenesis. We prove that there is no way to avoid this conclusion in a minimal three-flavour setup. We then comment on the simplest ways out. In particular, we focus on a resolution utilising a second Higgs doublet. Such models predict an automatically SM-like Higgs boson, (maximally) TeV-scale scalar states, and low- to intermediate-scale hierarchical leptogenesis with .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Neutrino Physics Research
