Bounds on Nanoscale Nematicity in Single-Layer FeSe/SrTiO$_3$
Dennis Huang, Tatiana A. Webb, Shiang Fang, Can-Li Song, Cui-Zu Chang,, Jagadeesh S. Moodera, Efthimios Kaxiras, Jennifer E. Hoffman

TL;DR
This study employs STM and QPI imaging with a developed T-matrix model to quantitatively constrain the presence of static nematic orbital order in single-layer FeSe/SrTiO$_3$, finding no detectable static nematicity above certain thresholds.
Contribution
The paper introduces a T-matrix based QPI analysis method to nanoscale detect and set bounds on static nematic orbital order in FeSe/SrTiO$_3$.
Findings
No static orbital order larger than 20 nm domain size
Fermi wave vector difference less than 0.014 π
Energy splitting less than 3.5 meV
Abstract
We use scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and quasiparticle interference (QPI) imaging to investigate the low-energy orbital texture of single-layer FeSe/SrTiO. We develop a -matrix model of multi-orbital QPI to disentangle scattering intensities from Fe and bands, enabling the use of STM as a nanoscale detection tool of nematicity. By sampling multiple spatial regions of a single-layer FeSe/SrTiO film, we quantitatively exclude static orbital ordering with domain size larger than = 20 nm 20 nm, Fermi wave vector difference larger than = 0.014 , and energy splitting larger than = 3.5 meV. The lack of detectable ordering pinned around defects places qualitative constraints on models of fluctuating nematicity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
