From solar to stellar corona: the role of wind, rotation and magnetism

TL;DR

This paper develops a method to estimate stellar wind magnetic flux and torque from surface magnetic field observations, improving models of stellar rotational evolution and magnetic field generation.

Contribution

It introduces a new technique to determine the source surface radius and open magnetic flux using wind simulations, enhancing the modeling of stellar wind effects without costly simulations.

Findings

Provided a criterion for magnetic field line opening

Developed a tool to estimate open magnetic flux from observations

Compared spin-down time scales with observational data

Abstract

Observations of surface magnetic fields are now within reach for many stellar types thanks to the development of Zeeman-Doppler Imaging. These observations are extremely useful for constraining rotational evolution models of stars, as well as for characterizing the generation of magnetic field. We recently demonstrated that the impact of coronal magnetic field topology on the rotational braking of a star can be parametrized with a scalar parameter: the open magnetic flux. However, without running costly numerical simulations of the stellar wind, reconstructing the coronal structure of the large scale magnetic field is not trivial. An alternative -broadly used in solar physics- is to extrapolate the surface magnetic field assuming a potential field in the corona, to describe the opening of the field lines by the magnetized wind. This technique relies on the definition of a so-called source surface radius, which is often fixed to the canonical value of 2.5Rsun. However this value likely varies from star to star. To resolve this issue, we use our extended set of 2.5D wind simulations published in 2015, to provide a criteria for the opening of field lines as well as a simple tool to assess the source surface radius and the open magnetic flux. This allows us to derive the magnetic torque applied to the star by the wind from any spectropolarimetric observation. We conclude by discussing some estimations of spin-down time scales made using our technique, and compare them to observational requirements.