Static IMRT and VMAT planning on 6 MV Flattened and Flattening-Filter-Free Beams of a TrueBeam VirtuaLinac System
Yue Yan, Poonam Yadav, Daniel Saenz, Bhudatt R. Paliwal

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of Monte Carlo simulations for clinical IMRT and VMAT plans on a TrueBeam system using flattened and FFF beams, aiding in treatment verification.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of phase space file accuracy for TrueBeam beams, comparing MC simulations with clinical data to support treatment verification.
Findings
Good agreement between MC and clinical data for both beam types
Quantified dose deviations to assist physicists in verification
Supports use of MC for treatment plan validation
Abstract
In this manuscript, we investigated the accuracy of the entire chain of phase space files generated by the TrueBeam VirtuaLinac system in clinical treatment plans. Good agreement was obtained between the MC simulation and the clinical golden data for both flattened and FFF beams. The relative magnitude of agreement between MC and golden beam data presented in this research may assist a physicist in terms of the percent dose deviation that one may expect when using MC data for verification purposes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAntenna Design and Optimization
