Semantics for a Logic of Presuppositions
X. Y. Newberry

TL;DR
This paper develops a semantics for a logic of presuppositions by connecting it to truth-relevant logic, extending it to polyadic cases, and discussing its implications within a propositional framework.
Contribution
It demonstrates that truth-relevant logic is a propositional form of the logic of presuppositions and extends the semantics to polyadic logic.
Findings
Truth-relevant logic is a propositional version of the logic of presuppositions.
A semantics for the logic of presuppositions is constructed using truth-relevant logic.
The semantics is extended to polyadic logic with discussed consequences.
Abstract
In 1952 P. F. Strawson proposed a logic of presuppositions. It is an interpretation of Aristotelian logic, i.e. of the logic of the traditional syllogism. In 1981 Richard Diaz published a monograph in which he presented truth-relevant logic. This paper shows that truth-relevant logic is but a propositional version of the logic of presuppositions. A semantics of the logic of presuppositions is developed using truth-relevant logic. The semantics is then further extended to polyadic logic and some consequences discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
