Finding communities in sparse networks
Abhinav Singh, Mark Humphries

TL;DR
This paper introduces reluctant backtracking operators for spectral community detection in sparse networks, improving upon non-backtracking methods by accounting for hanging trees and optimizing modularity.
Contribution
The paper proposes reluctant backtracking operators that explicitly include hanging trees, outperforming non-backtracking operators in certain sparse networks, and links their spectrum to modularity optimization.
Findings
Reluctant backtracking operators detect communities in sparse networks where non-backtracking operators fail.
Spectrum of reluctant backtracking operators approximately maximizes modularity.
Normalization of operators influences performance on real-world networks.
Abstract
Spectral algorithms based on matrix representations of networks are often used to detect communities but classic spectral methods based on the adjacency matrix and its variants fail to detect communities in sparse networks. New spectral methods based on non-backtracking random walks have recently been introduced that successfully detect communities in many sparse networks. However, the spectrum of non-backtracking random walks ignores hanging trees in networks that can contain information about the community structure of networks. We introduce the reluctant backtracking operators that explicitly account for hanging trees as they admit a small probability of returning to the immediately previous node unlike the non-backtracking operators that forbid an immediate return. We show that the reluctant backtracking operators can detect communities in certain sparse networks where the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
