What Powers the 3000-Day Light Curve of SN 2006gy?
Ori D. Fox (UC Berkeley), Nathan Smith (Steward), S. Mark Ammons, (Lawrence Livermore), Jennifer Andrews (Steward), K. Azalee Bostroem (UC, Davis), S. Bradley Cenko (NASA Goddard/UMD), Geoffrey C. Clayton (LSU), Eli, Dwek (NASA Goddard), Alexei V. Filippenko (UC Berkeley)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the powering mechanism of SN 2006gy's exceptionally luminous and long-lasting light curve, providing evidence that late-time infrared emission is driven by circumstellar interaction rather than radioactive decay or thermal echoes.
Contribution
It presents the first detections of SN 2006gy at around 3000 days post-explosion using HST and Keck AO, and identifies CSM interaction as the source of late-time infrared emission.
Findings
Optical light curve consistent with scattered-light echo
Thermal echo insufficient to explain K'-band emission
Infrared emission powered by CSM interaction in dense dust shell
Abstract
SN 2006gy was the most luminous SN ever observed at the time of its discovery and the first of the newly defined class of superluminous supernovae (SLSNe). The extraordinary energetics of SN 2006gy and all SLSNe (>10^51 erg) require either atypically large explosion energies (e.g., pair-instability explosion) or the efficient conversion of kinetic into radiative energy (e.g., shock interaction). The mass-loss characteristics can therefore offer important clues regarding the progenitor system. For the case of SN 2006gy, both a scattered and thermal light echo from circumstellar material (CSM) have been reported at later epochs (day ~800), ruling out the likelihood of a pair-instability event and leading to constraints on the characteristics of the CSM. Owing to the proximity of the SN to the bright host-galaxy nucleus, continued monitoring of the light echo has not been trivial,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
