Representations of Aut(M)-Invariant Measures
Nathanael Ackerman

TL;DR
This paper extends the Aldous-Hoover-Kallenberg theorem to Aut(M)-invariant measures, characterizing when such measures can be represented via Aut(M)-recipes, especially for free structures.
Contribution
It introduces Aut(M)-recipes and the concept of free structures, providing a representation theorem for Aut(M)-invariant measures.
Findings
Aut(M)-recipes characterize Aut(M)-invariant measures.
Free structures ensure all such measures are representable.
Representation relates measures on M to measures on free structures.
Abstract
In this paper we generalize the Aldous-Hoover-Kallenberg theorem concerning representations of distributions of exchangeable arrays via collections of measurable maps. We give criteria when such a representation theorem exists for arrays which need only be preserved by a closed subgroup of the symmetric group over . Specifically, for a countable structure M, with underlying set the , we introduce the notion of an "Aut(M)-recipe", which is an Aut(M)-invariant array obtained via a collection of measurable functions indexed by the Aut(M)-orbits in M. We further introduce the notion of a "free structure" and then show that if M is free then every Aut(M)-invariant measure on an Aut(M)-space is the distribution of an Aut(M)-recipe. We also show that if a measure is the distribution of an Aut(M)-recipe it must be the restriction of a measure on a free structure.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Cellular Automata and Applications
