Antimatter in the Direct-Action Theory of Fields
R. E. Kastner

TL;DR
This paper explores how the direct-action theory of fields can interpret negative energy solutions as antimatter without relying on the Feynman propagator, challenging traditional quantum field theory views.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the Feynman propagator is not essential for interpreting negative energies as antimatter within the direct-action framework.
Findings
Negative energy solutions can be interpreted as antimatter without the Feynman propagator.
The direct-action theory offers an alternative perspective to standard quantum field theory.
The interpretation of antimatter is retained in the absence of virtual particle descriptions.
Abstract
One of Feynman's greatest contributions to physics was the interpretation of negative energies as antimatter in quantum field theory. A key component of this interpretation is the Feynman propagator, which seeks to describe the behavior of antimatter at the virtual particle level. Ironically, it turns out that one can dispense with the Feynman propagator in a direct-action theory of fields, while still retaining the interpretation of negative energy solutions as antiparticles.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Biofield Effects and Biophysics · advanced mathematical theories
