On the Consistency of the Crossmatch Test
Ery Arias-Castro, Bruno Pelletier

TL;DR
This paper proves the consistency of Rosenbaum's crossmatch test for two-sample goodness-of-fit across all fixed alternatives, extending its theoretical foundation.
Contribution
It establishes the first proof of the test's consistency against all fixed alternatives and develops a general consistency framework.
Findings
The crossmatch test is consistent against all fixed alternatives.
A general consistency result applicable to similar tests is developed.
Theoretical validation enhances the test's reliability in practice.
Abstract
Rosenbaum (2005) proposed the crossmatch test for two-sample goodness-of-fit testing in arbitrary dimensions. We prove that the test is consistent against all fixed alternatives. In the process, we develop a general consistency result based on (Henze & Penrose, 1999) that applies more generally.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
