Implications of the Diboson Excess for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay and Lepton Flavor Violation in TeV Scale Left Right Symmetric Model
Ram Lal Awasthi, P. S. Bhupal Dev, Manimala Mitra

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the diboson excess at the LHC, interpreted within a TeV-scale Left-Right symmetric model, impacts low-energy experiments searching for neutrinoless double beta decay and lepton flavor violation, highlighting potential for future tests.
Contribution
It links LHC diboson excess interpretation to predictions for neutrinoless double beta decay and lepton flavor violation within a specific Left-Right symmetric framework, considering current and future experimental constraints.
Findings
Current $0 uetaeta$ experiments constrain low-mass RH neutrinos.
Future ton-scale $0 uetaeta$ experiments can probe most parameter space.
Lepton flavor violation constraints are effective for heavier RH neutrinos.
Abstract
Inspired by the recent diboson excess observed at the LHC and possible interpretation within a TeV-scale Left-Right symmetric framework, we explore its implications for low-energy experiments searching for lepton number and flavor violation. Assuming a simple Type-II seesaw mechanism for neutrino masses, we show that for the right-handed (RH) gauge boson mass and coupling values required to explain the LHC anomalies, the RH contribution to the lepton number violating process of neutrinoless double beta decay () is already constrained by current experiments for relatively low-mass (MeV-GeV) RH neutrinos. The future ton-scale experiments could probe most of the remaining parameter space, irrespective of the neutrino mass hierarchy and uncertainties in the oscillation parameters and nuclear matrix elements. On the other hand, the RH contribution to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
