Forward $J/\psi$ production in U$+$U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=193 GeV
A. Adare, C. Aidala, N.N. Ajitanand, Y. Akiba, R. Akimoto, J., Alexander, M. Alfred, K. Aoki, N. Apadula, H. Asano, E.T. Atomssa, T.C. Awes,, B. Azmoun, V. Babintsev, M. Bai, X. Bai, N.S. Bandara, B. Bannier, K.N., Barish, S. Bathe, V. Baublis, C. Baumann, S. Baumgart

TL;DR
This study measures $J/$ production in U+U collisions at 193 GeV, comparing it with Au+Au collisions to understand suppression and coalescence effects at different centralities.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of $J/$ yields and nuclear modification factors in U+U collisions, and investigates the impact of different Glauber model parameterizations on collision scaling.
Findings
$J/$ suppression is similar in U+U and Au+Au for peripheral and midcentral collisions.
Less suppression of $J/$ observed in the most central U+U collisions.
Results suggest $car{c}$ coalescence plays a significant role in $J/$ production at high energy densities.
Abstract
The invariant yields for production at forward rapidity in UU collisions at =193 GeV have been measured as a function of collision centrality. The invariant yields and nuclear-modification factor are presented and compared with those from AuAu collisions in the same rapidity range. Additionally, the direct ratio of the invariant yields from UU and AuAu collisions within the same centrality class is presented, and used to investigate the role of coalescence. Two different parameterizations of the deformed Woods-Saxon distribution were used in Glauber calculations to determine the values of the number of nucleon-nucleon collisions in each centrality class, , and these were found to give significantly different values. Results using values from both deformed Woods-Saxon…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
