The HI Tully-Fisher Relation of Early-Type Galaxies
Milan den Heijer, Tom A. Oosterloo, Paolo Serra, Gyula I.G. Jozsa,, Juergen Kerp, Raffaella Morganti, Michele Cappellari, Timothy A. Davis,, Pierre-Alain Duc, Eric Emsellem, Davor Krajnovic, Richard M. McDermid,, Torsten Naab, Anne-Marie Weijmans, P. Tim de Zeeuw

TL;DR
This study examines the HI and baryonic Tully-Fisher relations in early-type galaxies, revealing offsets from spiral galaxies and supporting the universality of the baryonic relation across galaxy types.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of the Tully-Fisher relation for early-type galaxies using HI kinematics, demonstrating its consistency with spiral galaxy relations when accounting for stellar populations.
Findings
Early-type galaxies are offset from spiral Tully-Fisher relation by 0.5-0.7 mag.
Residuals correlate with stellar mass-to-light ratio, indicating stellar populations drive the offset.
Baryonic Tully-Fisher relation is tighter and consistent across galaxy types.
Abstract
We study the HI K-band Tully-Fisher relation and the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation for a sample of 16 early-type galaxies, taken from the ATLAS3D sample, which all have very regular HI disks extending well beyond the optical body (> 5 R_eff). We use the kinematics of these disks to estimate the circular velocity at large radii for these galaxies. We find that the Tully-Fisher relation for our early-type galaxies is offset by about 0.5-0.7 magnitudes from the relation for spiral galaxies. The residuals with respect to the spiral Tully-Fisher relation correlate with estimates of the stellar mass-to-light ratio, suggesting that the offset between the relations is mainly driven by differences in stellar populations. We also observe a small offset between our Tully-Fisher relation with the relation derived for the ATLAS3D sample based on CO data representing the galaxies' inner regions (< 1…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
