Can Compactifications Solve the Cosmological Constant Problem?
Mark P. Hertzberg, Ali Masoumi

TL;DR
This paper critically examines claims that certain higher-dimensional compactifications can solve the cosmological constant problem, arguing that these models overlook the core issue of why mbda is much smaller than other physical scales.
Contribution
The paper clarifies that existing toy models do not address the true cosmological constant problem and provides a general argument about the role of moduli and Planck mass in this context.
Findings
Toy models remove or set to zero other mass scales, ignoring the real problem.
Including realistic mass scales reintroduces the problem, often requiring accidental cancellations.
Models that set moduli masses to zero trivially solve mbda, but are physically unmotivated.
Abstract
Recently, there have been claims in the literature that the cosmological constant problem can be dynamically solved by specific compactifications of gravity from higher-dimensional toy models. These models have the novel feature that in the four-dimensional theory, the cosmological constant is much smaller than the Planck density and in fact accumulates at . Here we show that while these are very interesting models, they do not properly address the real cosmological constant problem. As we explain, the real problem is not simply to obtain that is small in Planck units in a toy model, but to explain why is much smaller than other mass scales (and combinations of scales) in the theory. Instead, in these toy models, all other particle mass scales have been either removed or sent to zero, thus ignoring the real problem. To this end, we provide a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
