The inferred evolution of the cold gas properties of CANDELS galaxies at 0.5 < z < 3.0
G. Popping, K. I. Caputi, S. C. Trager, R. S. Somerville, A. Dekel, S., A. Kassin, D. D. Kocevski, A. M. Koekemoer, S.M. Faber, H. C. Ferguson, A., Galametz, N. A. Grogin, Y. Guo, Y. Lu, A. van der Wel, and B. J. Weiner

TL;DR
This study estimates cold gas, atomic hydrogen, and molecular gas in 24,000 galaxies from the CANDELS survey across redshifts 0.5 to 3.0, revealing how gas properties evolve with stellar mass and cosmic time using an inversion of star formation laws.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method to infer cold gas content in galaxies over a wide redshift range, extending scaling relations beyond current direct measurement capabilities.
Findings
Cold gas mass correlates with stellar mass at all redshifts.
Molecular fractions increase with stellar mass and look-back time.
Cold gas fraction decreases over time regardless of stellar mass.
Abstract
We derive the total cold gas, atomic hydrogen, and molecular gas masses of approximately 24 000 galaxies covering four decades in stellar mass at redshifts 0.5 < z < 3.0, taken from the CANDELS survey. Our inferences are based on the inversion of a molecular hydrogen based star formation law, coupled with a prescription to separate atomic and molecular gas. We find that: 1) there is an increasing trend between the inferred cold gas (HI and H2), HI, and H2 mass and the stellar mass of galaxies down to stellar masses of 10^8 Msun already in place at z = 3; 2) the molecular fractions of cold gas increase with increasing stellar mass and look-back time; 3) there is hardly any evolution in the mean HI content of galaxies at fixed stellar mass; 4) the cold gas fraction and relative amount of molecular hydrogen in galaxies decrease at a relatively constant rate with time, independent of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
