No evidence for bulk velocity from type Ia supernovae
Dragan Huterer, Daniel L. Shafer, Fabian Schmidt

TL;DR
This study investigates the impact of peculiar velocities on low-redshift type Ia supernovae, finding no evidence for bulk velocity beyond standard cosmological expectations and emphasizing the importance of including velocity correlations in analyses.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that accounting for velocity correlations is essential for accurate bulk flow measurements and clarifies that previous bulk flow signals may be noise-induced rather than physical.
Findings
No evidence for excess bulk flow beyond $ m extLambda$CDM expectations.
Including velocity correlations is crucial for correct bulk flow inference.
Much of the inferred bulk flow is due to noise bias, not real motion.
Abstract
We revisit the effect of peculiar velocities on low-redshift type Ia supernovae. Velocities introduce an additional guaranteed source of correlations between supernova magnitudes that should be considered in all analyses of nearby supernova samples but has largely been neglected in the past. Applying a likelihood analysis to the latest compilation of nearby supernovae, we find no evidence for the presence of these correlations, although, given the significant noise, the data is also consistent with the correlations predicted for the standard CDM model. We then consider the dipolar component of the velocity correlations -- the frequently studied "bulk velocity" -- and explicitly demonstrate that including the velocity correlations in the data covariance matrix is crucial for drawing correct and unambiguous conclusions about the bulk flow. In particular, current supernova data is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
