Are there any nicely structured preference~profiles~nearby?
Robert Bredereck, Jiehua Chen, Gerhard J. Woeginger

TL;DR
This paper studies the computational complexity of determining whether a preference profile can be made to exhibit certain desirable structures by removing a small number of voters or alternatives, classifying which cases are tractable or NP-hard.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive complexity classification for the problem of editing preference profiles to achieve structured forms by deletions.
Findings
Some profile structures can be achieved efficiently via polynomial-time algorithms.
Other structures are NP-hard to obtain through minimal deletions.
The paper delineates the boundary between tractable and intractable cases.
Abstract
We investigate the problem of deciding whether a given preference profile is close to having a certain nice structure, as for instance single-peaked, single-caved, single-crossing, value-restricted, best-restricted, worst-restricted, medium-restricted, or group-separable profiles. We measure this distance by the number of voters or alternatives that have to be deleted to make the profile a nicely structured one. Our results classify the problem variants with respect to their computational complexity, and draw a clear line between computationally tractable (polynomial-time solvable) and computationally intractable (NP-hard) questions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
