Can gravity account for the emergence of classicality?
Yuri Bonder, Elias Okon, Daniel Sudarsky

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the claim that gravity-induced decoherence explains the quantum-to-classical transition, arguing that the evidence does not support gravity as the primary cause and emphasizing the importance of experimental context.
Contribution
The paper challenges previous claims that gravity causes universal decoherence leading to classicality, providing clarifications and disputing the universality of such effects.
Findings
Disputes the universality of gravity-induced decoherence
Highlights the importance of experimental context in observing interference
Argues gravity is not responsible for the quantum-to-classical transition in discussed scenarios
Abstract
A recent debate has ensued over the claim by Pikovski et al. [Nat. Phys. 11, 668 (2015)] that systems with internal degrees of freedom undergo a universal, gravity-induced, type of decoherence that explains their quantum-to-classical transition. This decoherence is supposed to arise from the different gravitational redshifts experienced by such systems when placed in a superposition of two wave packets at different heights in a gravitational field. Here we investigate some aspects of the discussion with the aid of simple examples. In particular, we first resolve an apparent conflict between the reported results and the equivalence principle by noting that the static and free-fall descriptions focus on states associated with different hypersurfaces. Next, we emphasize that predictions regarding the observability of interference become relevant only in the context of concrete experimental…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
