Dissecting the Power Sources of Low-Luminosity Emission-Line Galaxy Nuclei via Comparison of HST-STIS and Ground-Based Spectra
Anca Constantin (1), Joseph C. Shields (2), Luis C. Ho (3, 4),, Aaron J. Barth (5), Alexei V. Filippenko (6), and Christopher A. Castillo (1), ((1) James Madison U., (2) Ohio U., (3) Kavli Institute for Astronomy and, Astrophysics, (4) Peking U., (5) UC Irvine, (6) UC Berkeley)

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution and ground-based spectra of galaxy nuclei to analyze the power sources of low-luminosity emission-line galaxies, revealing the prevalence of accretion and star formation activities and their variability over time.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive atlas of emission-line measurements and compares nuclear and larger-scale spectra, offering new statistical insights into the nature of LINERs and Transition Objects.
Findings
Weak aperture dependence in line ratios suggests density gradients influence excitation.
Higher incidence of broad H_alpha emission in high-resolution data supports accretion models.
Potential broad-line variability over a decade indicates dynamic nuclear activity.
Abstract
Using a sample of ~100 nearby line-emitting galaxy nuclei, we have built the currently definitive atlas of spectroscopic measurements of H_alpha and neighboring emission lines at subarcsecond scales. We employ these data in a quantitative comparison of the nebular emission in Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and ground-based apertures, which offer an order-of-magnitude difference in contrast, and provide new statistical constraints on the degree to which Transition Objects and low-ionization nuclear emission-line regions (LINERs) are powered by an accreting black hole at <10 pc. We show that while the small-aperture observations clearly resolve the nebular emission, the aperture dependence in the line ratios is generally weak, and this can be explained by gradients in the density of the line-emitting gas: the higher densities in the more nuclear regions potentially flatten the excitation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
