The ASKAP/EMU Source Finding Data Challenge
A. M. Hopkins (1), M. T. Whiting (2), N. Seymour (3), K. E. Chow (2),, R. P. Norris (2), L. Bonavera (4), R. Breton (5), D. Carbone (6), C. Ferrari, (7), T. M. O. Franzen (3), H. Garsden (8), J. Gonzalez-Nuevo (9, 4), C. A., Hales (10, 11), P. J. Hancock (3, 12, 13)

TL;DR
The paper reports on a comprehensive data challenge for radio source finding tools in the EMU survey, evaluating their accuracy, limitations, and potential improvements for ASKAPsoft.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of multiple source finders on simulated data, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations for enhancing ASKAPsoft.
Findings
Most finders achieve near 100% completeness at 10sigma.
Reliability remains high at 10sigma but varies at lower sensitivities.
Trade-offs between completeness and reliability are evident across tools.
Abstract
The Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) is a proposed radio continuum survey of the Southern Hemisphere up to declination +30 deg., with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP). EMU will use an automated source identification and measurement approach that is demonstrably optimal, to maximise the reliability, utility and robustness of the resulting radio source catalogues. As part of the process of achieving this aim, a "Data Challenge" has been conducted, providing international teams the opportunity to test a variety of source finders on a set of simulated images. The aim is to quantify the accuracy of existing automated source finding and measurement approaches, and to identify potential limitations. The Challenge attracted nine independent teams, who tested eleven different source finding tools. In addition, the Challenge initiators also tested the current…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
