Ecological-economic modelling of interactions between wild and commercial bees and pesticide use

TL;DR

This paper integrates ecological and economic models to analyze how farm practices, especially pesticide use and commercial bee introduction, impact wild bee populations and ecosystem services, highlighting thresholds and policy implications.

Contribution

It presents a novel combined ecological-economic model showing how farm incentives and pesticide policies influence wild bee viability and ecosystem sustainability.

Findings

Increasing farm output can cause wild bee decline.

Introduction of commercial bees may lead to wild bee extinction.

Adjusting pesticide and commercial bee prices can restore wild bee populations.

Abstract

The decline in extent of wild pollinators in recent years has been partly associated with changing farm practices and in particular with increasing pesticide use. In this paper we combine ecological modelling with economic analysis of a single farm output under the as- sumption that both pollination and pest control are essential inputs. We show that the drive to increase farm output can lead to a local decline in the wild bee population. Commercial bees are often considered an alternative to wild pollinators, but we show that their intro- duction can lead to further decline and finally local extinction of wild bees. The transitions between different outcomes are characterised by threshold behaviour and are potentially difficult to predict and detect in advance. Small changes in economic parameters (input prices) and ecological parameters (wild bees carrying capacity and effect of pesticides on bees) can move the economic-ecological system beyond the extinction threshold. We also show that increasing the pesticide price or decreasing the commercial bee price might lead to re-establishment of wild bees following their local extinction. Thus, we demonstrate the importance of combining ecological modelling with economics to study the provision of ecosystem services and to inform sustainable management of ecosystem service providers.