Relativistic Bohmian mechanics without a preferred foliation
Bruno Galvan

TL;DR
This paper proposes a relativistic Bohmian mechanics model that does not rely on a preferred foliation of spacetime, potentially resolving conflicts with relativity by considering all foliations equally valid.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach where no law determines a preferred foliation, uniting all foliations into a single model, challenging previous assumptions of a covariant law.
Findings
The model unifies all foliations without a preferred one.
It suggests the absence of a preferred foliation reduces conflicts with relativity.
The approach is empirically equivalent to existing models.
Abstract
In non-relativistic Bohmian mechanics the universe is represented by a probability space whose sample space is composed of the Bohmian trajectories. In relativistic Bohmian mechanics an entire class of empirically equivalent probability spaces can be defined, one for every foliation of spacetime. In the literature the hypothesis has been advanced that a single preferred foliation is allowed, and that this foliation derives from the universal wave function by means of a covariant law. In the present paper the opposite hypothesis is advanced, i.e., no law exists for the foliations and therefore all the foliations are allowed. The resulting model of the universe is basically the "union" of all the probability spaces associated with the foliations. This hypothesis is mainly motivated by the fact that any law defining a preferred foliation is empirically irrelevant. It is also argued that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
