Obstructions to convexity in neural codes
Caitlin Lienkaemper, Anne Shiu, and Zev Woodstock

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which neural codes, specifically convex neural codes related to hippocampal place cells, have local obstructions, providing classifications and counterexamples for codes on up to five neurons.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the previously assumed equivalence between convexity and absence of local obstructions does not hold in general, and classifies all codes on five neurons with no local obstructions.
Findings
Counterexample on five neurons disproves the converse for neural codes.
Complete classification of codes on five neurons with no local obstructions.
New criterion for non-mandatory intersections of maximal codewords.
Abstract
How does the brain encode spatial structure? One way is through hippocampal neurons called place cells, which become associated to convex regions of space known as their receptive fields: each place cell fires at a high rate precisely when the animal is in the receptive field. The firing patterns of multiple place cells form what is known as a convex neural code. How can we tell when a neural code is convex? To address this question, Giusti and Itskov identified a local obstruction, defined via the topology of a code's simplicial complex, and proved that convex neural codes have no local obstructions. Curto et al. proved the converse for all neural codes on at most four neurons. Via a counterexample on five neurons, we show that this converse is false in general. Additionally, we classify all codes on five neurons with no local obstructions. This classification is enabled by our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
