Performance Bounds for Pairwise Entity Resolution
Matt Barnes, Kyle Miller, Artur Dubrawski

TL;DR
This paper establishes theoretical bounds linking small-scale validation performance to large-scale dataset performance in pairwise entity resolution, facilitating scalable optimization using limited labeled data.
Contribution
It introduces bounding properties that connect small validation set performance to large dataset performance, aiding scalable entity resolution.
Findings
Proves bounds between small and large dataset performance
Enables optimization of algorithms with limited labeled data
Supports scaling entity resolution to massive datasets
Abstract
One significant challenge to scaling entity resolution algorithms to massive datasets is understanding how performance changes after moving beyond the realm of small, manually labeled reference datasets. Unlike traditional machine learning tasks, when an entity resolution algorithm performs well on small hold-out datasets, there is no guarantee this performance holds on larger hold-out datasets. We prove simple bounding properties between the performance of a match function on a small validation set and the performance of a pairwise entity resolution algorithm on arbitrarily sized datasets. Thus, our approach enables optimization of pairwise entity resolution algorithms for large datasets, using a small set of labeled data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Quality and Management · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Topic Modeling
