On the Onsager conjecture in two dimensions
A. Cheskidov, M. C. Lopes Filho, H. J. Nussenzveig Lopes, R. Shvydkoy

TL;DR
This paper investigates energy conservation in 2D Euler equations, establishing conditions for conservation based on vorticity integrability, constructing a counterexample at the critical space, and showing energy conservation in vanishing viscosity limits.
Contribution
It provides a direct mollification-based proof of energy conservation for vorticity in L^{3/2}, constructs a sharp counterexample at the Onsager critical space, and proves energy conservation in supercritical regimes via vanishing viscosity.
Findings
Energy is conserved if vorticity is in L^{3/2}.
Constructed a counterexample with non-vanishing flux at the critical space.
Solutions from vanishing viscosity with vorticity in L^p (p>1) conserve energy.
Abstract
This note addresses the question of energy conservation for the 2D Euler system with an -control on vorticity. We provide a direct argument, based on a mollification in physical space, to show that the energy of a weak solution is conserved if . An example of a 2D field in the class for any , and (Onsager critical space) is constructed with non-vanishing energy flux. This demonstrates sharpness of the kinematic argument. Finally we prove that any solution to the Euler equation produced via a vanishing viscosity limit from Navier-Stokes, with , for , conserves energy. This is an Onsager-supercritical condition under which the energy is still conserved, pointing to a new mechanism of energy balance restoration.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNavier-Stokes equation solutions · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
