Upper bounds on sparticle masses from naturalness or how to disprove weak scale supersymmetry
Howard Baer, Vernon Barger, Michael Savoy

TL;DR
This paper establishes objective upper bounds on sparticle masses based on electroweak naturalness, providing a predictive framework to test the viability of weak scale supersymmetry through experimental searches.
Contribution
It demonstrates that electroweak naturalness can be formalized as an objective principle and derives updated upper bounds on sparticle masses within specific SUSY models.
Findings
Gluino mass upper bound of 4 TeV in NUHM2 model.
Gluino mass upper bound of 7 TeV in pMSSM.
Electroweak naturalness measure _{BG}<30 implies _{EW}>30, indicating fine-tuning.
Abstract
While it is often stated that the notion of electroweak (EW) naturalness in supersymmetric models is subjective, fuzzy and model-dependent, here we argue the contrary: electroweak naturalness can be elevated to a {\it principle} which is both objective and predictive. We demonstrate visually when too much fine-tuning sets in at the electroweak scale which corresponds numerically to the measure \Delta_{BG}~\Delta_{EW}> 30. While many constrained SUSY models are already excluded by this value, we derive updated upper bounds on sparticle masses within the two-extra parameter non-universal Higgs model (NUHM2). We confirm the classic Barbieri-Giudice (BG) result that \Delta_{BG}<30 implies mu <350 GeV. However, by combining dependent soft terms which appear as multiples of m_{3/2} in supergravity models, then we obtain m(gluino)< 4 TeV as opposed to the BG result that m(gluino)<350 GeV. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
